I have had my '58 2.2d for a year now (12,000 miles) and for the first time I decided to check the amount of fuel really used against the computer reading.
Actual consumption over 420 miles worked out at 44.2mpg. The computer over the same period reads 52.3mpg. Most of this mileage was done on a trip from Newcastle, Edinburgh, Glasgow and back to Newcastle at fairly high speeds. Wouldn't like to say exactly how high in print but I am not really unhappy with with 44mpg.
However I was really surprised at the discrepancy in the consumption figures. Does anyone know if this is typical? Is this a big enough error to class as a fault?